A Review of Elizabeth J. Meyer’s (2025) Queer
Justice at School: A Guide for Youth Activists, Allies, and Their Teachers
Jaclyn Roach, University of Regina
In a
short 170-page text, Queer Justice at
School: A guide for youth activists, allies, and their teachers (2025,
Teachers College Press), Elizabeth J. Meyer calls attention to the enduring
need for queer justice in the K–12 school system and offers both practical
ideas for queering schools, as well
as theoretical and data-driven reasons why this work is so important.
Elizabeth J. Meyer serves as a professor and program chair in
Educational Foundations at the University of Colorado, Policy and Practice. She
is also the author of Gender, Bullying, and Harassment: Strategies to End
Sexism and Homophobia in Schools (2009). In both that book and Queer
Justice, Meyer’s research focuses on gender and sexual diversity issues in
K–12 education, and she works to support teachers, youth activists, and allies
in advocating for queer communities in schools. Combining personal experience
and research-based evidence, Meyer (2025) guides readers of Queer Justice at
Schools through a journey of engaging in meaningful work in queer
communities in and beyond institutional spaces.
As a cis, white, heterosexual woman and descendant of settlers living
and working in Saskatchewan, I approach this text from a place of privilege and
professional engagement. I work in the field of education as a sessional
instructor at the University of Regina and the Saskatchewan Urban Native
Teacher Education Program (SUNTEP), and I am also a master’s student with my
research focused on trauma-informed pedagogy. Both roles position me as a
learner and a facilitator of learning. This dual perspective shapes the way I
read texts like this—with a commitment to reflecting on my own practices, while
also considering how the ideas might resonate with and be approached by both
teacher candidates and educators in the field. Additionally, my role as a
sessional instructor of teacher candidates allows me considerable influence
regarding how future educators will position themselves in the field. Because
of the intersection of these multiple roles, it is essential that I remain
current in the challenges and solutions that are facing the education
profession.
In our collective North American political and social climate, queer
communities are facing an increase in hatred and attacks from the public (Adamczeski, 2025; Egale Canada, 2024; Luneau, 2023) and, as
Venet (2024) claims, the “education system is not doing what our students need
it to do” (p. 22). Venet (2024) goes on to argue that “kids
are not broken," so we must address "the conditions, systems, and
structures that harm kids” (p. 13). Queer kids
in schools are under attack, and every day it becomes increasingly important for
teachers in the field to support their queer students (Hansen & Hubbard,
2025; Leung et al., 2022). Teachers “do not feel confident about respectfully
engaging with LGBTQ+ issues in the classroom” (Hansen & Hubbard, 2025), and
“a norm of LGBTQ silence exists in the school environment” (Leung et al.,
2022). Echoing these challenges, according to Meyer (2025), “...many LGBTQIA+
students do not feel safe at school” (p. 3). Considering approximately one in
four students in K–12 schools identify as queer (GLSEN, 2022), this is a
significant cause for concern, making Meyer’s text a sorely needed response in
this political climate, especially.
While Meyer’s text is situated in an American legal context, and there
is a need for Canadian readers to reflect on their own legal context alongside
this work, the way Meyer models the translation of legal frameworks into
classroom contexts serves as a valuable example. In similarity to other North
American contexts, in Saskatchewan, the “legal strategy of leveraging parental
rights has been effective in advancing individual rights over efforts to
promote educational opportunity and equity in public schools” (Meyer, 2025, p.
99). Teachers, students, and families in the province are currently grappling
with the effects and implications of Bill 137 (the “Parents’ Bill of Rights”),
which aims to increase ‘parental involvement’ in their children’s education,
including what is taught in the K–12 classroom. In addition, the Bill requires
parental consent before teachers and staff in schools can use a student’s
chosen name or pronouns if the student is under 16 years old (Legislative
Assembly of Saskatchewan, 2023; Johnson Shoyama
Graduate School of Public Policy [JSGS], 2023). The implementation of Bill 137
is problematic, especially because it uses the notwithstanding clause, and
raises significant concerns around the impact on, and rights of, the children
in our province, although “the clause was meant to be used sparingly, as a
‘last resort,’ not as a routine tool to override the Charter rights” (JSGS,
2023, p. 3). Because of these public policy challenges that students and
teachers in Saskatchewan are facing, the opportunity to learn from and engage
with Queer Justice in Schools has been a timely and necessary endeavour.
Although many educators feel inclined to support queer students, there
are also a significant number of educators who are not confident in what that actually looks like (Hansen & Hubbard, 2022; JSGS,
2023; Leung et al., 2023). Meyer (2025) offers practical insights into how
teachers can approach this work in meaningful and safe ways. As a former high
school teacher, Meyer saw the challenges that queer students and their
advocates and allies faced in schools every day. Her goal was to respond to
what the educators around her were regularly asking for: “more resources,
accessible research, support, ideas, and information about how to do this kind
of work with their students” (Meyer, 2025, p. xi). Suggestions are offered for
a variety of situations and contexts, allowing the text to be accessible to a
variety of folks. Importantly, Meyer approaches important topics with knowledge
and humility.
This text is not just about supporting queer students, but also about
approaching education differently. Meyer’s discussion around queering
the curriculum (Chapter 3) and our schools is a necessary one, but begs the
question – what does queering our schools even mean? According to Meyer
(2025), “it means questioning the ways that heterosexuality and gender binaries
work together to produce cisheteronormativity
by being presented as ‘normal’ or ‘natural’” (p. 1). Queering schools involves
“rethinking and pushing boundaries” (p. 33), fighting against the “banking
model” of learning that “describes traditional approaches to schooling where
the teacher deposits facts and knowledge in the minds of students, who are seen
as passive receptacles” (p. 33), and “encourages learning that disrupts
normalcy” (p. 38). Although central to the conversation, this work is not just
about supporting queer kids specifically; it’s about demanding better for all
students, recognizing curriculum violence, or “the result of classroom content
and pedagogy that harms students intellectually and emotionally” (Venet, 2024,
p. 32), while further recognizing the ways that teachers and school systems can
perpetuate harm so that we can do better. So, while the suggestions in this
text alone won’t fix the injustice that educators and students in schools are
experiencing, they can help people to feel grounded and supported in the work
that they are doing, while supporting all students in accessing a more
just and equitable educational experience.
Queer Justice
at School is Meyer’s (2025) research-informed practitioner’s guide,
organized in a way that allows the reader to learn the important background of
the topic first, followed by different areas of a school that can be ‘queered,’
ending in some salient strategies for action. Although many scholars agree that
supporting queer students in school is a challenge, Meyer guides readers beyond
the problem and into some solutions
that can be realistically applied in K–12 settings. Of particular interest is
the way she provides ideas for teachers in multiple contexts and at a variety
of stages in their own journeys of advocacy and activism. Within each section
of the text, she offers theoretical information and data-informed knowledge;
personal stories and experiences; concluding thoughts; discussion questions;
and key terms. The structure of the text makes it easy to read and accessible
to academics and educators alike, which aligns with her experience that
demonstrated “that many educators and mentors want to better support youth doing
this work but don’t have the time to extensively research, plan, and prepare
for every meeting” (Meyer, 2025, p. xii).
Meyer is effective in her goals, providing readers with well-evidenced
reasons for the importance of the work, along with data-driven information to
support teachers and students in convincing others of that importance.
Additionally, the strategies she provides support many different contexts and
will be helpful to teachers at all levels of advocacy and allyship. Although
the book reads as a collection of anecdotes, her claims are regularly supported
by relevant research and experiences of others in the K-12 field. One of the
ways that this text diverges from other scholarly research on the topic is that
there is a heavy focus on the importance of joy in this work. Meyer
(2025) asserts that “Queer pedagogies also invite us to focus on joy,
pleasure, and desire or eros in learning” (p. 33), and she consistently
models this throughout the text through her ideas for advocacy, examples of joy
and resistance, and her stories of the positive impact doing this work can
have. Rather than generating new information or research around queer pedagogy
and the practical implications of queering curriculum and schools, Meyer offers
a text that puts research into practice in a way that is accessible to folks
whose hands the book should be in: classroom teachers and youth activists.
Although the text is accessible to and a strong guide for practitioners
in the field, it needs to be noted that in order for real
change to occur within our K–12 schools, the system needs to change.
Meyer’s suggestions for teachers are practical, possible, and hopeful, but if
we truly want to see safer spaces for queer youth and a queering of the way we
teach, we must see systemic change within these workspaces. We must demand a
more “ecological approach” (Venet, 2024, p. xv), where we pursue system shifts
that address not just the needs of individuals, but “also the structures,
systems, and inequalities” (p. 8) that harm both educators and students in the
K–12 system. Despite the helpful strategies in the text, there are some
questions left unanswered about how to truly sustain this work amidst systemic
resistance and political hostility. The importance of the work in this climate
is clear, but for educators and students in particularly conservative contexts,
more tools for navigating that institutional pushback would be
invaluable. This book will be especially valuable to classroom teachers,
teacher educators, and youth organizers seeking practical strategies for
queer-affirming educational spaces and folks who are looking to challenge the
idea of what school is as they begin working towards turning it into what
school could be.
Despite these minimal shortcomings, the strength of Meyer’s text lies in
her ability to bridge theory and practice, what Venet (2024) refers to as tying
together “research, philosophy, and rubber-meets-the-road strategies” (p. xix).
Additionally, the focus on joy as resistance plays a significant role in the
text, placing less emphasis on what Meyer refers to as “risk narratives,” or
discussions of the harms done to the LGBTQ+ community, and more emphasis on
“queer joy, rest as resistance, and freedom-dreaming” (Meyer, 2025, p. 131).
Ultimately, Queer Justice at School is a text not meant to be analyzed
from a theoretical standpoint, but one to be carried into classrooms, staff
meetings, and other spaces where organizing and queer allyship live. It is a
call to action for all educators and youth allies, and activists who are ready
to move away from silence and into more joyful, collective forms of resistance.
Meyer leaves readers with the motivation and excitement to do the work, so “as
Margaret Mead reminds us, ‘a small group of committed citizens can change the
world.’ Now let’s get to it!” (p. 12).
References
Adamczeski, R. (2025, October 22). Anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes have risen
around the world since 2020: report. Advocate. https://www.advocate.com/crime/anti-lgbtq-hate-crimes-world
Egale Canada. (2024, July 29). Hate crimes targeting 2SLGBTQI
communities are rising every year: Egale Canada calls on all levels of
government to take action. Egale in Action. https://egale.ca/egale-in-action/2023-hate-crimes-july29/
GLSEN. (2022). 2021 National School Climate Survey: Executive summary
[PDF]. GLSEN. https://www.glsen.org
Hansen, M., & Hubbard, A. (2025, March 6). Actions against LGBTQ+
students also threaten K-12 teachers. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/actions-against-lgbtq-students-also-threaten-k-12-teachers/
Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public
Policy. (2023). Bill 137 (Parents’ Bill of Rights): Policy brief [PDF].
University of Regina & University of Saskatchewan. https://www.schoolofpublicpolicy.sk.ca/research-ideas/publications-and-policy-insight/policy-brief/bill-137.php
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan. (2023). Bill 137: The Education
(Parents’ Bill of Rights) Amendment Act, 2023 [PDF]. Legislative Assembly
of Saskatchewan. https://docs.legassembly.sk.ca/legdocs/Bills/29L3S/Bill29-137.pdf
Leung, E., Kassel-Gomez, G., Sullivan, S., Murahara,
F., & Flanagan, T. (2022). Social support in schools and related outcomes
for LGBTQ youth: a scoping review. Discover Education, 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-022-00016-9
Luneau, D. (2023, September 23). New FBI Data: Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate
Crimes Continue to Spike, Even as Overall Crime Rate Declines. Human Rights
Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-fbi-data-anti-lgbtq-hate-crimes-continue-to-spike-even-as-overall-crime-rate-declines
Meyer, E. M.
(2025). Queer justice at school: A guide for youth activists, allies, and
their teachers. Teachers College Press.
Venet, A. S. (2024). Equity-centered trauma-informed education.
Routledge.