Metaphor, Emotion, and Ethics: Arts-Based and Queer
Pedagogy as Transformative Reflection
Johanathan Woodworth, Mount Saint Vincent University
Andrea Fraser, Mount Saint Vincent
University
Phillip Joy, Mount Saint Vincent University
Authors’
Note
Johanathan Woodworth https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-3329
Andrea Fraser https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-1685
Phillip Joy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5252-2076
Correspondence
concerning this article should be addressed to Johanathan
Woodworth at johan.woodworth@msvu.ca.
Abstract
This
study explores how arts-based and queer pedagogical frameworks can foster
transformative learning in higher education through reflective writing.
Situated within a required undergraduate course on cultural safety and
structural competency, the research analyzed twelve students’ structured
reflections following engagement with queer-themed comics. Using arts-informed
thematic analysis, the study examined how emotion, metaphor, and ethical
awareness emerged in students’ writing as indicators of transformative
learning. Findings revealed four interrelated themes: affective and
transformative awareness, unlearning and identity repositioning, care and
professional ethics, and structural awareness and responsibility. Students used
figurative language, such as metaphors of growth, constraint, and journey, to
articulate emotional and ethical transformation, demonstrating that written
reflection can function as an aesthetic and embodied mode of inquiry.
Integrating arts-based and queer pedagogical principles enabled learners to
translate discomfort into ethical insight and reimagine professional care as a
practice grounded in empathy, relationality, and justice. Rather
than treating reflection as a neutral record of learning, this study argues
that writing itself became part of the learning event: a medium through which
students named dissonance, worked through discomfort, and imagined more ethical
forms of professional practice. The study concludes that language itself
can serve as a transformative medium, enacting the affective, critical, and
creative dimensions of arts-based and queer pedagogy.
Keywords: queer pedagogy, arts-based pedagogy,
transformative reflection
Metaphor, Emotion, and Ethics: Arts-Based and Queer
Pedagogy as Transformative Reflection
Higher
education frequently reproduces normative assumptions about knowledge,
professionalism, and identity. Conventional pedagogies privilege cognition over
affect, linear reasoning over embodied knowing, and objectivity over relational
engagement (Ellsworth, 2005; hooks, 1994). These traditions shape who is
recognized as a legitimate participant in academic spaces and whose epistemic
practices are marginalized (Kumashiro, 2002).
Arts-based and queer pedagogies offer critical alternatives that position emotion,
embodiment, and creative inquiry as valid modes of knowing.
Rigid
disciplinary boundaries have long constrained opportunities for learners to
engage uncertainty, vulnerability, and difference as productive forces (Boler,
1999). In professional programs such as health, business, or science, learning
often remains instrumental rather than transformative. The emphasis on
neutrality and standardization reproduces what queer theorists describe as
normativity: the institutionalization of dominant assumptions about gender,
sexuality, race, and ability (Bonnet et al., 2023; Britzman, 1995). As a
result, the affective and creative dimensions of learning are often
marginalized, limiting education’s transformative potential.
This
study positions arts-based and queer pedagogies as frameworks for reimagining
higher education learning. Through narrative inquiry, it examines students’
structured reflections following an arts-based activity. These reflections
function as texts through which students articulated emotion, identity, and
ethical awareness. Through language, they confronted tensions between
self-perception and social expectation, visibility and erasure, and personal
transformation and collective responsibility. Reflective writing thus
demonstrates how language can enact the epistemic and affective possibilities
theorized in arts-based and queer pedagogies.
The
activity at the centre of this study asked students to engage with five comics
from Rainbow Reflections: Body Image Comics for Queer Men, an anthology
designed to bring queer men’s body image research into dialogue with narrative
art beyond conventional academic publication (Joy et al., 2019). The anthology
frames body image not as a private psychological issue alone, but as something
shaped by masculinity, social norms, stigma, and everyday experiences of
visibility and exclusion (Joy et al., 2019). That framing matters here because
students were not simply reacting to isolated stories, but rather, they were
reading texts already structured to hold together embodiment, culture, and
health. The comics also offered a distinct form of engagement: visual narrative
slowed interpretation, drew attention to juxtaposition and silence, and seemed
to invite more textured responses to vulnerability, bodily comparison, shame,
and recognition than a more conventional classroom text might have done.
This
study contributes to a growing body of research that treats creativity not as
peripheral to cognition but as a primary means of engaging ethical and
relational learning (Barone & Eisner, 2012; Clover & Stalker, 2007).
Arts-based
pedagogy, rooted in Dewey’s experiential education, situates aesthetic
experience at the core of meaning-making (Dewey, 1934). Artistic creation
serves as a process and method, integrating emotional, sensory, and
interpretive knowing (Leavy, 2020). Even without direct art-making,
interpretive engagement can promote experimentation, risk-taking, and openness
to ambiguity, which are conditions for transformation (Rolling, 2013). This
approach shifts attention from mastery of content to engagement with process,
emphasizing how learners construct meaning through affective and social
encounters.
What
arts-based pedagogy contributes here is not only the inclusion of art in
teaching, but, more specifically, it offers a way of understanding how form,
feeling, and interpretation work together. In that sense, the educational value
of the comics does not lie merely in representing queer experience. It lies in
the way visual and narrative form invite learners to dwell in tension, to
notice what exceeds summary, and to respond with language that is itself often
metaphorical, tentative, and emotionally charged.
Queer
pedagogy complements this orientation by questioning the norms that shape
educational life. Grounded in feminist and critical traditions, it interrogates
what counts as knowledge and who produces it (Bonnet et al., 2023; Britzman,
1995). Discomfort becomes an opportunity for learning rather than a pedagogical
failure (Kumashiro, 2002). Teaching becomes an act of
unlearning, dismantling taken-for-granted truths and opening space for
multiplicity and difference (hooks, 1994). Both pedagogies thus centre affect,
ambiguity, and relationality.
Queer
pedagogy, in turn, contributes more than a general concern with inclusion. Its
sharper intervention is its insistence that educational spaces are structured
by norms long before any student speaks. It asks what becomes visible,
intelligible, or sayable in the classroom, and what remains disqualified as
excessive, improper, or unintelligible. For this study, that matters because
the reflections are not simply records of student opinion. They are traces of
how students encountered, resisted, or reworked normative assumptions about
bodies, masculinity, professionalism, and care.
Integrating
these approaches allows educators to study how reflective writing embodies both
expressive and critical functions. Arts-based pedagogy draws attention to tone,
metaphor, and emotion, while queer pedagogy interprets these affective
expressions as challenges to normativity (McDonald & Motala, 2022). Through
this interaction, reflection becomes a creative and ethical inquiry capable of
advancing transformative learning (Mezirow, 2000; Taylor, 2009). Collectively,
these frameworks allow reflection to be read not as a transparent self-report,
but as a site where students work through discomfort, revise assumptions, and
begin to articulate ethical and professional reorientation.
This
study investigates how written reflection, informed by arts-based and queer
pedagogical principles, can foster transformative learning in higher education.
It examines how reflective language enables students to explore the affective,
ethical, and relational dimensions of learning and professional formation. The
research is guided by three questions:
1. How do
students use written reflection to articulate identity, assumptions, and
emerging professional self-understanding within arts-based, queer pedagogical
spaces?
2. What
affective and transformative processes emerge through the writing of structured
reflections?
3. How can
reflective writing function as a catalyst for ethical and justice-oriented
learning in higher education?
By
recontextualizing data originally collected in a professional program, the
study situates its analysis within broader discussions of teaching and learning
in postsecondary education. It contributes to scholarship that views
transformation as emerging not from content transmission but from engagement
with complexity, emotion, and relational experience (Caniglia & Vogel,
2023).
This
study bridges three domains, arts-based pedagogy, queer pedagogy, and
transformative learning, whose intersections remain underexplored in higher
education research (Sameshima et al., 2019). Bringing these concepts together
clarifies how learning environments can challenge normativity while cultivating
reflexivity, ethical awareness, and professional self-examination.
Arts-based
pedagogy contributes methods for engaging tacit, affective, and embodied
dimensions of knowing (Barone & Eisner, 2012). Queer pedagogy destabilizes
assumptions about identity, knowledge, and power, revealing how inclusion and
representation are politically structured (Bonnet et al., 2023; Britzman,
1995). Transformative learning adds a developmental account of how reflection
and disorientation may yield new ways of knowing and acting (Mezirow, 2000;
Taylor, 2009). Taken together, these frameworks suggest that
transformation is not purely cognitive, but also relational, embodied, and
affective (Boler, 1999; Braidotti, 2013; hooks, 1994).
Methodologically, the study advances reflective
writing as an arts-informed mode of inquiry and shows how structured reflection
can function as part of pedagogy rather than as a simple record of it. The students were asked to move through prior
knowledge, reflection on learning, and implications for practice, while also
responding in class to prompts about message, cultural reference, emotional
response, and professional application. That structure mattered because it
scaffolded movement from recognition to interpretation to ethical response.
Practically,
the study contributes to conversations about inclusion and justice-oriented
pedagogy in higher education. Arts-based and queer pedagogies engage learners
intellectually, emotionally, and socially, while modelling care, critique, and
reflexive responsibility. Treating reflective writing as both
analytic and ethical shows one way these pedagogies can be enacted in
professional education.
Transformative
learning theory explains how learners reconstruct meaning through critical
reflection and affective engagement. Mezirow (1978, 2000) described
transformation as the reassessment of assumptions prompted by disorienting
dilemmas. These emotionally charged experiences can lead to shifts in
self-understanding and social awareness (Kreber, 2012).
Subsequent
scholars expanded the theory to include emotion and embodiment (Dirkx, 2001).
Clark and Dirkx (2008) treated emotion as integral to meaning-making, while
Caniglia and Vogel (2023) argued that affective tension, rather than rational
analysis, often initiates transformation. Within higher education,
transformative learning supports engagement with complex topics such as
identity and justice when discomfort is framed as productive rather than
disruptive. However, institutional rationalism often discourages emotional
inquiry, restricting transformative potential. More recent work also resists framing transformation as
linear, outcome-driven, or purely cognitive. Instead, contemporary approaches
emphasize affect, relationality, and process in shaping how learners come to
re-evaluate assumptions and professional identities (Jonker, 2024). This
orientation is especially important in fields such as dietetics, where
pedagogical practices may reproduce narrow norms of health, behaviour, and
bodily legitimacy. Critiques of such normalization have called for ‘body-becoming’
pedagogies that emphasize process, affect, and the expansion of possibilities
for embodiment through creative engagement (Rice, 2015). Arts-based and
narrative methods can support this work by making emotional and embodied
knowledge more available to reflection and interpretation (Denton & Cain,
2023; Joy, 2025).
Arts-based
pedagogy responds to this limitation. Creative practice offers non-linear,
affect-rich inquiry that invites learners to externalize and question
assumptions (Barone & Eisner, 2012). Even when direct art-making is absent,
written reflection can serve a parallel function by enabling affective
expression through language. Aesthetic engagement with words, metaphor, and
tone transforms sensory experience into a site of critical meaning-making
(Leavy, 2020). This process extends Mezirow’s framework by integrating emotion,
material practice, and aesthetic expression as catalysts for transformation.
Recent research reinforces this view by emphasizing creative practices as
central to posthuman and affective approaches to learning (Norton
et al., 2024; Sinervo & Freedman, 2022).
In this study, written reflection substitutes for material art-making but
performs a comparable function as a container for affective processing and
interpretive synthesis.
At the
same time, transformative learning is often written as though disorientation is
enough on its own. It is not. Discomfort may open the possibility of revision,
but it does not guarantee it. Learners still need a medium through which they
can test language, reflect on feelings, and connect personal reactions to
broader social patterns. In this study, structured writing appears to have
served that mediating function. It gave students a way to move from reaction to
articulation. That movement is important because the reflections show that
emotional disturbance became educationally significant when students could name
it, examine it, and connect it to future professional practice.
Rooted
in Dewey’s (1934) philosophy of art as experience, arts-based pedagogy situates
aesthetic creation at the heart of learning. It reframes artistic expression as
embodied inquiry that unites perception, emotion, and cognition. Learners
engage with ideas through creative and reflective means, deepening
understanding through affective and sensory channels (Barone & Eisner, 2012;
Leavy, 2020).
In
higher education, arts-based methods support reflective practice across fields
such as education, health, and social work (Clover & Stalker, 2007;
Rolling, 2013). They allow students to visualize systems, explore ethics, and
articulate marginalized perspectives. Similar to experiential learning’s cycle
of experience, reflection, and conceptualization (Kolb, 1984), arts-based
pedagogy transforms creative engagement into conceptual insight, validating
emotion as epistemic.
Although
much research emphasizes visual or performative modalities, this study applies
arts-based principles to written expression. Reflective writing functions as an
aesthetic act through which students organize experience, emotion, and insight
(Boncori et al., 2024). The process mirrors artistic
creation by allowing learners to materialize feeling and thought through text.
Arts-based pedagogies also create opportunities for students to engage complex
social issues through visual, narrative, and embodied forms that extend beyond
traditional modes of knowledge transmission. Such approaches can support
critical inquiry and social inclusion by creating space for marginalized
experiences to be encountered through counter-narrative and creative expression
(Chappell & Chappell, 2016). They also challenge conventional assumptions
about what counts as valid knowledge by emphasizing reflexive, relational, and
multimodal ways of knowing (McLean, 2022). In the present study, comics
function as a specific arts-based medium that combines visual and textual
storytelling, enabling students to engage with body image, identity, and social
norms through an affective and interpretive form (Joy et al., 2020).
By
prioritizing process over product, arts-based inquiry highlights the dynamic
rhythm of tension and resolution, a structure paralleling transformative
learning (Leavy, 2020). Through this lens, uncertainty and contradiction become
generative sources of understanding rather than deficiencies (Sameshima et al.,
2019). Written reflection sustains this rhythm through composing and revising,
where language becomes a medium of inquiry. Recent scholarship demonstrates
that reflective practices can engage digital and embodied dimensions of
learning without requiring multimodal artefacts (Anttila et al.,
2024; Aragón et al., 2025).
The
present study also differs from much arts-based pedagogy research in a simple
but important way: the students were not producing the primary artworks under
analysis. They were responding to existing comics and then writing about that
encounter. That distinction shifts the pedagogical emphasis from expression
alone to interpretation, relation, and uptake. The learning does not happen
only in making; it can also happen in reading, discussing, and then trying to
render that encounter into words.
The
approach, however, requires ethical attention. Uncritical use of arts-based
methods may reproduce harm if emotional exposure is poorly supported (Boler,
1999; Clover & Stalker, 2007). Effective facilitation depends on trust,
consent, and relational accountability. These principles apply equally to
written reflection, where emotional vulnerability demands careful framing. Such
ethical commitments link arts-based pedagogy to queer pedagogy’s ethic of
discomfort and care.
Emerging
from critical and feminist traditions, queer pedagogy interrogates how
normativity structures knowledge and learning (Bonnet et al., 2023; Britzman,
1995). It moves beyond inclusion models to question heteronormative assumptions
that define epistemic authority. Learning becomes a relational, political
encounter that values uncertainty and ambivalence. Britzman (1995, p. 165)
described queer pedagogy as “unsettling,” and Bonnet et al. (2023) emphasized
tension between knowing and not knowing as a condition for ethical reflection. Kumashiro (2002) likewise framed discomfort as essential to
unlearning internalized norms.
This
ethic parallels transformative learning’s notion of disorienting dilemmas but
expands its scope from individual cognition to collective and structural
awareness. Queer pedagogy centres relationality, asserting that teaching and
learning are co-constituted through affective exchange rather than transmission
(McDonald & Motala, 2022). Difference and tension sustain thought rather
than hinder it. Scholars such as Ahmed (2020) and Fraser and Lamble (2014)
highlight queer discomfort as a critical force for inclusive higher education
by exposing institutional power relations. Poststructural
queer approaches further challenge fixed categories of identity by emphasizing
embodiment, relationality, and the discursive production of norms (Marnell,
2017). This is particularly relevant in educational settings where
heteronormativity and racialized otherness may be reproduced through
institutional and pedagogical practice, often without being named directly
(Selvaraj, 2021). Read in this way, queer pedagogy does not simply invite
inclusion; it creates conditions for students to question how bodies,
identities, and professional expectations are made intelligible in the first
place.
Written
reflection provides a textual site for these dynamics. Through narrative,
students externalize affective tension and articulate moments of ethical
struggle, materializing the uncertainty that queer pedagogy deems pedagogically
valuable. Reflection thus becomes both process and evidence of queer learning.
It challenges binaries between teacher and learner and between theory and
practice. Yet institutional pressures for efficiency often conflict with the
openness queer pedagogy requires (Bonnet et al., 2023; hooks, 1994). Sustaining
such affective work necessitates dialogic ethics and structured support
(Woolley, 2022). Facilitators cultivate safety through shared agreements and
iterative reflection rather than neutrality.
What is
especially useful about queer pedagogy for this study is its suspicion of tidy
resolution. The student reflections often move unevenly. They contain
uncertainty, partial recognition, and moments where students can sense a prior
assumption breaking down but do not yet have a clean vocabulary for what comes
next. That incompleteness is not a weakness of the data. It is part of what
queer pedagogy helps make legible. Learning here is not a march toward mastery.
It is a more unsettled process of noticing, questioning, and trying to respond
differently.
When
combined, transformative, arts-based, and queer pedagogy produce a model of
learning grounded in emotion, embodiment, and ethics. Transformative learning
provides an account of disorientation and perspective change, arts-based
pedagogy foregrounds expressive and affective ways of knowing, and queer
pedagogy brings a critical attention to normativity, uncertainty, and power
(Brookfield, 2024; hooks, 1994; Mezirow, 2000). Together, they
frame learning as a co-created process shaped by social, affective, and
political conditions rather than by cognition alone.
Across
these concepts, discomfort is not treated as failure but as a condition of
possibility. In transformative learning, disorientation can provoke reflection;
in arts-based inquiry, tension can generate insight; and in queer pedagogy,
discomfort can expose the norms that structure what is knowable and sayable
(Boler, 1999; Bonnet et al., 2023; McMain, 2024). Emotion and embodiment
further connect these traditions by refusing a sharp division between thought
and feeling (Britzman, 1995; Springgay et al., 2005).
This
integration is useful for the present study because it allows students’ writing
to be read as more than an opinion or a summary. It supports the interpretation
of reflective writing as a site where feeling, critique, and professional
imagination meet. The integrated framework also aligns with broader critical
and participatory traditions in education, which emphasize reflexive engagement
with power, inequality, and social justice (de Carvalho, 2025; Kindon et al., 2024). Within classroom contexts, arts-based
inquiry has been shown to support more inclusive learning environments by
interrupting binary and heteronormative assumptions and fostering alternative
ways of knowing and being (Wargo, 2019). This orientation is especially
relevant here, where queer comics and structured reflection were used not
simply to transmit information, but to create conditions for critical,
affective, and relational engagement with marginalized experiences. Comics have
been theorized not only as sites of queer representation but also as a queer
medium marked by multiplicity, instability, and resistance to fixed meaning
(Scott & Fawaz, 2018). That understanding supports the methodological approach
taken in this study, which reads students’ written reflections as sites where
meaning is constructed through language, emotion, and engagement with
difference.
This
methodological approach follows directly from the conceptual framing outlined
above. Because the study is grounded in arts-based, queer, and transformative
pedagogies, students’ structured reflections are treated not as neutral reports
of learning but as situated acts of meaning-making through which affect,
ethical awareness, and professional self-positioning become legible.
Research
Design
This
qualitative study employed an arts-informed interpretive design to examine how
arts-based and queer pedagogical practices foster transformative learning in
higher education. Arts-based research values creativity, emotion, and
reflexivity as legitimate means of generating knowledge (Barone & Eisner,
2012; Leavy, 2020). The analysis focused exclusively on students’
structured written reflections documenting their engagement with an arts-based
classroom activity centred on cultural safety and structural competency. No
visual or multimodal artefacts were collected.
This
reanalysis extends prior work on the same dataset from a professional education
context by applying an integrated framework connecting arts-based, queer, and
transformative pedagogies. Written reflections were selected because they
captured participants’ metacognitive and affective responses, revealing how
learners articulated transformation through language. Treating reflection
itself as a creative medium demonstrates how textual analysis can illuminate
affective and ethical learning.
The
study followed a constructivist epistemology, viewing knowledge as co-created
through interpretation and dialogue (Crotty, 1998). This stance aligns with
transformative learning theory, which defines learning as revising assumptions
through reflection (Mezirow, 2000), and with queer pedagogy, which foregrounds
the affective and relational dimensions of learning (Bonnet et al., 2023;
Britzman, 1995). Together, these frameworks informed a methodology attentive to
emotion, identity, and ethics as central to transformation.
Because
the data source was reflective writing rather than interviews or visual
artefacts, the analysis did not treat students’ texts as transparent reports of
inner change. Instead, the reflections were read as situated acts of
meaning-making through which students interpreted emotion, reconsidered
assumptions, and connected classroom learning to imagined professional
practice. This distinction is important to the present study’s methodological
contribution.
The
study occurred in a required undergraduate nutrition course at a Canadian
university focused on cultural safety and structural competency. The course
emphasized reflective practice and social justice within health professions
education. Students participated in an arts-based learning activity titled Understanding
Culture through Art: LGBTQ2SP+ Cultural Safety and Structural Competency,
designed to promote perspective transformation through engagement with queer
narratives concerning body image, stigma, and inclusion.
Participants
were undergraduate students enrolled in a required third-year dietetics course
in a Canadian university dietetics program. The course is an introductory
professional practice course focused on client care, communication,
counselling, and professionalism. The learning activity analyzed in this study
occurred in the fourth week of the course, within a unit on cultural safety,
equity, and structural competency, and invited students to reflect specifically
on LGBTQ2SP+ health and dietetic practice. Although students had prior exposure
to broader concepts of diversity and cultural safety in earlier coursework,
this assignment represented a more explicit engagement with LGBTQ2SP+ content.
No participant-specific demographic data were collected for this study.
However, Canadian dietetics cohorts are widely described as predominantly women
and disproportionately white, and the present cohort likely reflects that
broader pattern (Brady & Ng, 2025; Gheller et al., 2018). All participants
were former students who had completed the course and received final grades
before recruitment.
As part
of the learning activity, students read five comics from Rainbow Reflections:
‘Garden,’ ‘Little Fox,’ ‘Pieces I’m Keeping,’ ‘Blob,’ and ‘Through the Looking
Glass.’ These texts were selected to represent a range of queer experiences,
body-image concerns, and visual narrative approaches relevant to the course
themes of cultural safety and structural competency. Together, the comics
engaged issues of racialized belonging, trans embodiment, bodily autonomy,
fatness, stigma, masculinity, and social exclusion, while differing in tone,
form, and affective register. This range was intended to support both emotional
engagement and critical reflection by inviting students to encounter diverse
experiences of embodiment and normativity through a multimodal arts-based
medium. Although the comics were engaged as multimodal texts, the present study
does not analyze their visual features as primary data; instead, it examines
how students interpreted and reflected on those texts through structured
writing. Students were introduced to the anthology as a collection of queer
body-image comics, but the present study did not systematically examine how
creator biography or autoethnographic framing shaped students’ responses.
Students were introduced to the assignment during the first week of class and
were asked to read the selected comics in advance of the scheduled class
discussion.
In small
groups, students discussed the comics using structured prompts:
1. Identify
the main message.
2. Describe
relevant cultural or social references.
3. Note
emotional responses.
4. Identify
key insights about queer men’s experiences.
5. Consider
how comics might be used to discuss cultural issues with clients.
Groups
then shared insights with the class in a facilitated discussion. This
collective meaning-making process encouraged critical reflection on
professional assumptions and empathy toward marginalized experiences. An
individual learning reflection from each student was due one week later.
The
structured prompts were designed to guide students from interpretation to
cultural noticing, affective response, and professional application. In this
sense, structure was part of the pedagogy rather than a neutral container for
reflection. It also shaped the data available for analysis, as the written
reflections often moved from prior assumptions to emotional responses to
ethical or practice-based implications, mirroring the sequence of the activity
itself.
Data
Source and Analytic Approach
The data
source was students’ structured written reflections
submitted after the activity. Each reflection included three sections: (1)
prior knowledge of LGBTQ+ body image issues, (2) insights and implications for
practice, and (3) key takeaways or intended professional actions. Submissions
ranged from 800 to 1,500 words. Twelve students consented for their anonymized
reflections to be used in research. These texts provided rich data illustrating
affective, ethical, and cognitive aspects of transformation. Data were analysed
using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) guided by an arts-based
interpretive lens. Although textual, the analysis attended to metaphor,
emotion, and rhythm, which are qualities that characterize reflective writing.
In
addition to thematic content, the analysis considered how students wrote: where
they qualified claims, registered uncertainty, shifted tone, or relied on
figurative language to make sense of discomfort and learning. This was
especially important given the study’s interest in reflective writing as an
aesthetic as well as analytic practice.
1. Open
Coding: Each reflection was read multiple times, and key phrases related to
affect, identity, bias, and ethics were identified.
2. Axial
Coding: Codes were clustered into conceptual categories reflecting affective
awareness, unlearning, ethical care, and structural consciousness.
3. Thematic
Synthesis: Broader themes were developed by connecting codes to theoretical
constructs from transformative learning and queer pedagogy.
4. Reflexive
Dialogue: Researchers revisited coded data collaboratively, reflecting on how
positionality and assumptions influenced interpretation.
Analytic
memos were used throughout to record interpretive decisions, link codes to
theoretical concepts, and maintain transparency.
A
further analytic concern involved distinguishing between stated aspiration and
demonstrated transformation. Students frequently expressed intentions to act
differently in future practice. These statements were treated as meaningful,
but they were not automatically taken as evidence of durable change. Instead,
they were interpreted as signs of ethical orientation and professional
re-positioning within the context of reflective learning.
Researchers
responsible for coding and analysis were external to the course and had no
prior interaction with participants, reducing potential bias from evaluative
relationships. Interpretive analysis of affective and ethical content required
reflexivity. Each researcher maintained a journal documenting assumptions,
reactions, and evolving insights.
Team
discussions served as peer debriefing to examine interpretive differences and
maintain analytic integrity. The researchers adopted an ethic of care informed
by Springgay et al.’s (2005) emphasis on relational and
aesthetic inquiry, interpreting expressive language contextually rather than as
neutral data. This commitment ensured participants’ words were treated as
meaning-making acts rather than as evidence to be objectified.
To
ensure coherence and rigour, a coding framework was developed to structure
interpretation. Table 1 summarizes analytic categories, definitions, inclusion
and exclusion criteria, and representative examples. The table provided both an
interpretive guide and a record of analytic reasoning, linking participants’
language to theoretical constructs while maintaining fidelity to student
expression.
Table 1
Analytic Framework for Structured Reflections.
|
Code Category |
Definition |
Inclusion Criteria |
Exclusion Criteria |
Illustrative Example (Student Reflection) |
|
Affective
Awareness |
Recognition
of emotional response and its role in learning |
Mentions
of vulnerability, pride, empathy, or discomfort |
Purely
descriptive statements |
“This
was a very transformative learning activity that sculpted my views.” |
|
Unlearning
Bias |
Acknowledgment
of internalized assumptions or stereotypes |
Explicit
reflection on previous misconceptions or bias |
Statements
about others without self-reflection |
“It
was uncomfortable to realize I have absorbed some of these stereotypes.” |
|
Ethical
Reflection |
Connection
between learning and responsibility in practice |
Mentions
of care, advocacy, or inclusive practice |
Personal
growth without ethical application |
“I
feel empowered to advocate for ending gender stereotypes.” |
|
Structural
Awareness |
Understanding
of social or institutional power relations |
Mentions
of privilege, normativity, or inequity |
Emotional
reactions without reference to systems |
“Body
image is not only about confidence but about social norms that privilege
certain kinds of bodies.” |
|
Transformative
Intention |
Evidence
of intended future change in action or perspective |
Statements
linking reflection to future behavior |
General
expressions of approval or satisfaction |
“I
want to ensure my future practice creates space for everyone.” |
This
coding framework also helped contain overinterpretation. It required analytic
distinctions between emotional response, critical self-recognition, ethical
commitment, and structural analysis, which were related but not interchangeable
across the dataset.
Credibility
was supported through peer debriefing and iterative code review. Dependability
was ensured by maintaining an audit trail of coding and memo writing. Reflexive
journaling established confirmability, and thick description of context
enhanced transferability. Ethical care guided all stages of analysis.
Reflections were anonymized before researcher access. Participants retained
intellectual ownership, and written consent was obtained. Because reflections
engaged personal and professional beliefs, interpretation prioritized
contextual sensitivity and fidelity to meaning. The analysis aimed to honour
participants’ agency while acknowledging that interpretation remains partial
and situated.
The
analysis of the twelve anonymized student reflections revealed four interconnected thematic patterns
describing how arts-based and queer pedagogical approaches facilitated
transformative learning in higher education. The themes were Affective and
Transformative Awareness, Unlearning and Identity Repositioning, Care and
Professional Ethics, and Structural Awareness and Responsibility. Together,
they show how students used reflective and creative processes to confront
assumptions, acknowledge bias, and articulate ethical commitments. The
quotations below are drawn directly from verified student work, although minor
grammatical adjustments were made for clarity.
Many
participants described the learning activity as emotional and self-reflective.
The creative and reflective elements helped them process feelings that are
often excluded from professional education. Students reported that the work was
not only informative but also personally moving and perspective-changing. One
participant wrote, “This was really a very transformative learning activity
that sculpted my views on LGBTQ+ issues, mainly regarding body image and health
care access.” Another explained, “I feel empowered and motivated to advocate
for and work towards ending gender stereotypes and practicing in a culturally
safe manner, especially towards those among LGBTQ2SP+ communities.” These
reflections illustrate how the process fostered affective engagement that led
to awareness of social responsibility.
Several
participants explicitly described shifts in attitude and empathy. One
reflection stated, “Reflecting on and acknowledging areas of personal bias,
including those that are subconscious and hidden, allows one not only to become
a better clinician, but a better person.” This awareness aligns with
transformative learning theory, which emphasizes reflection on assumptions and
emotional dissonance as catalysts for change (Mezirow, 2000). The emotional
tone of many reflections suggested that discomfort was necessary for learning.
One student commented, “This training activity encouraged me to remember to
approach new people and situations with an open mind, and to try not to
stereotype or make assumptions about people.” The language of humility and
openness illustrates affective transformation through the recognition of prior
bias.
At the
same time, the affective work in the reflections was rarely limited to broad
statements of empathy. Students often linked emotion to cognition and to
practice. For example, one participant wrote that the comics and discussion
“broadened my perspective” and made clear “the importance of empathy and to
create a comfortable, non-judgmental space for LGBTQ+ clients.” Another
described the activity as “eye-opening,” noting that it prompted reflection on
“other gaps in my perspective with regards to prevalent issues communities may
be facing.” In these instances, feeling did not remain private; it became the
basis for rethinking professional relations.
The
second theme reflected students’ efforts to unlearn stereotypes and reposition
themselves in relation to queer experience, professional responsibility, and
their own assumptions. Many
realized that they had absorbed cultural narratives about gender and body image
that influenced how they interacted with clients or peers. One student
observed, “Going into a client meeting with the assumption you already know how
a client may relate to their body does not leave room for an individual to
express what their actual lived experience is.” This statement demonstrates a
shift from assumptions toward relational listening, a central element of queer
pedagogy that emphasizes openness to difference (Britzman, 1995).
Several
participants linked the activity to a broader understanding of how
representation shapes practice. One reflection stated, “The comics exercise
made me think about how we visualize bodies and what we consider normal. It
made me realize that images also teach us what to value.” This awareness shows
how arts-based learning enabled students to connect aesthetic decisions with
social implications. Through visual reflection, they examined how norms about
bodies, gender, and health are reproduced through everyday professional
practices.
The
process of unlearning often involved emotional struggle. A participant
explained, “It was uncomfortable to realize I have absorbed some of these
stereotypes, but the project gave me a way to confront them without shame.” The
reflection shows that arts-based work allowed emotional exploration without
judgment. As Kumashiro (2002) argued, discomfort can
be a productive pedagogical space when learners feel supported to reflect
critically. In this context, creativity offered safety and distance while
sustaining ethical introspection.
The
reflections were somewhat uneven, however, in the extent to which they
documented identity negotiation strongly. What appeared more consistently was a
re-positioning of the self as learner and future practitioner. Students wrote
about becoming more open, more cautious about assumptions, and more attentive
to how their own prior understandings had been shaped. One participant, for
instance, reflected that they had previously stereotyped queer men as generally
more body positive and later recognized that this assumption “does not leave
room for individual experiences.” Another acknowledged surprise at realizing
they had connected insecurity and vulnerability to femininity, then described
feeling “ashamed” of that tendency and newly committed to challenging it. These
examples point less to a fully developed identity transformation than to a more
provisional but still meaningful shift in self-understanding.
A third
theme concerned how students redefined professional care and ethical practice.
Many connected the activity to an expanded understanding of empathy, cultural
humility, and advocacy. Their reflections demonstrated that care involves both
compassion and structural awareness. One participant wrote, “This activity
helped to provide a framework for structural competency, in that it provided an
example for how body image issues in queer men stem from societal pressures.”
This understanding aligns with the concept of critical empathy, which links
personal awareness with systemic critique (hooks, 1994).
Others
described the exercise as a way to reconnect them to their professional
purpose. One reflection read, “I feel like this activity helped me remember why
I wanted to go into this profession in the first place, to help people without
judgment.” This statement highlights how transformative learning can reaffirm
ethical commitments through reflection on practice. For many participants,
empathy became intertwined with accountability. In several
reflections, students explicitly moved beyond general kindness toward a more
demanding conception of care. As one student stated, “It made me realize
that being kind is not enough. You have to understand the structures that make
people feel unseen.”
Several reflections connected emotional insight
to practical change. One
participant explained that, as a future dietitian, it is important to ensure
that clients from the LGBTQ+ community “would feel open arms and a
non-judgmental ear for whatever struggles they may be facing.” Another wrote
about the need to ask clients their preferred names and pronouns, avoid
assumptions, and create a welcoming environment that allows clients to speak
openly about body image and food-related concerns. Through
creative reflection, students articulated ethical awareness as an ongoing,
relational process rather than a fixed principle. This demonstrates how
arts-based pedagogy encouraged learners to translate feeling into professional
responsibility.
The
fourth theme involved the recognition of social structures that shape
experiences of body, identity, and health. Participants identified how cultural
and institutional forces influence both clients and professionals. Several
reflections revealed new awareness of intersectionality and systemic
inequality. One student wrote, “This activity helped me realize that body image
is not only about personal confidence but about social norms that privilege
certain kinds of bodies.” Another explained, “It made me think about how health
care often assumes a straight, able, thin body, and that assumption leaves
people out.” This shift toward structural understanding aligns with
transformative learning’s later stages, in which insight broadens beyond the
personal and begins to orient future action.
Participants
recognized their roles within larger systems and described intentions to act
more inclusively. One reflection concluded, “I want to use what I learned to
make sure my future practice creates space for everyone, not just for people
who look like me.” The notion of responsibility appeared repeatedly in the
dataset. Learners framed responsibility as ongoing rather than as a one-time
ethical realization. One participant summarized, “It is not about feeling
guilty; it is about staying aware and making changes every day.” This emphasis
on sustained reflection and practice supports Caniglia and Vogel’s (2023)
interpretation of transformation as continuous ethical engagement.
What is
notable in these reflections is that students did not remain at the level of
individual prejudice alone. They repeatedly named wider forces such as minority
stress, stigma, discrimination, media ideals, and health care exclusion.
Several connected queer men’s body image concerns to social pressure,
heteronormative standards, and institutional barriers to care. In this way, the
reflections often moved from personal recognition to structural critique,
suggesting that the activity opened a space for linking self-examination with
broader social analysis.
Across
the reflections, students frequently used metaphors and figurative imagery to
express emotional movement, ethical awareness, and transformation. These
metaphors served as linguistic equivalents of the aesthetic processes
characteristic of arts-based learning, translating affective experience into
symbolic form. Through metaphor, learners articulated shifts in
self-perception, awareness of others, and relational responsibility. Figurative
language became a medium through which emotion and insight were
materialized, demonstrating how reflective writing can function as an
embodied art practice.
Several
participants drew on metaphors of growth and emergence to describe
transformation. One student interpreted the comic Garden as “the
metaphor of growth and transformation… magnificently used to represent the
self-discovery and acceptance of the protagonist’s queerness. The blooming of
the garden represents gradual self-acceptance, considering societal pressures
toward normalization.” This description externalized emotional learning through
natural imagery, framing self-understanding as a living and evolving process.
The same participant extended the metaphor to professional ethics, observing
that “self-acceptance itself is an empowering yet crucial step toward emotional
and psychological well-being.” Growth here became both personal and
professional, signifying ethical maturation.
Metaphors
of constraint and release appeared in students’ depictions of bias and
unlearning. A student reflecting on Garden explained that the character
wished to “shrink himself to normalcy,” linking the act of shrinking to
internalized oppression. This image recurred across multiple reflections as
learners described their own prior assumptions as limiting frames that had to
be dismantled. Another participant wrote that the activity allowed them to
“confront [stereotypes] without shame,” suggesting a movement from constriction
to expansion. The oscillation between shrinking and blooming functioned as a
metaphorical vocabulary for transformation, mirroring the tension central to
queer and transformative pedagogies: the movement from containment within normativity
toward openness and relational agency.
Other
students employed journey and spatial metaphors to express awareness and
connection. One participant reflected that the exercise “encouraged me to
remember to approach new people and situations with an open mind” and to “try
not to stereotype or make assumptions about people.” The language of openness
and movement framed learning as an ongoing relational path rather than a static
realization. Similarly, another student wrote that they aimed to “surround
[themselves] with like-minded people” and to “find their place,” expressing
transformation through spatial imagery that evokes belonging and ethical
orientation.
Several
reflections also contained aesthetic and existential metaphors linking life,
art, and empathy. One participant stated that “life is art and art imitates
life,” explaining that the comics were “an impactful way to educate… because
the art helped to really bring the emotions to life.” Another wrote that “the
added visual effects and storytelling aspect of the comic make it more
relatable and bring an emotional aspect… that is otherwise missed in other
methods of knowledge transfer.” These comments suggest that students
experienced their own writing as a continuation of the artistic process, using
language to render emotion visible. Reflection thus became both a record of
interpretation and a creative act through which learners reimagined ethical and
professional identity.
Importantly,
the metaphor in these reflections was not ornamental. It often did the
conceptual work that a direct statement could not easily accomplish. When
students reached for blooming, shrinking, openness, and movement, they were not
simply describing the comics; they were also describing their own learning as
process, tension, and reorientation. In that sense, figurative language
provided a means of registering transformation without reducing it to a single
declarative claim.
Collectively,
these metaphors reveal how learners enacted arts-based and queer pedagogical
principles through written expression. Figurative language provided a symbolic
grammar for articulating affective complexity and ethical aspiration. The
imagery of blooming, shrinking, opening, and journeying demonstrates that
transformation was experienced as movement, embodied, emotional, and
relational, rather than as cognitive resolution. Through metaphor, students
transformed reflection into aesthetic inquiry, enacting the very processes of
embodiment, care, and critique that the pedagogy sought to cultivate.
Together,
the four themes show how arts-based and queer pedagogical practices supported
transformative learning through emotion, self-examination, ethical reflection,
and structural awareness. The strongest evidence in the dataset
lies in students’ affective engagement, their reconsideration of assumptions,
their ethical repositioning as future practitioners, and their growing
awareness of structural inequity. Evidence of identity negotiation was present,
but less consistently and less fully than these other dimensions.
Overall, the reflections suggest that arts-based inquiry helped students
translate discomfort into critique and reimagine professional care as a
practice of empathy, responsibility, and justice.
The
findings suggest that structured reflective writing can serve as a meaningful
site of transformative learning in higher education. Rather than
emerging through rational reflection alone, the learning documented here took
shape through the interplay of emotion, critique, uncertainty, and ethical
self-positioning. The discussion considers four related dimensions of
that process: emotionality and embodiment, queering pedagogy through
reflection, the ethics of care and discomfort, and structural awareness in
relation to educational practice.
A
central insight from this study is the role of emotion and embodied awareness
in transformative learning. Across the dataset, participants described the
reflective process as one that required vulnerability and empathy. As one
student noted, “This was really a very transformative learning activity that
sculpted my views on LGBTQ+ issues, mainly regarding body image and health care
access.” Another wrote, “Reflecting on and acknowledging areas of personal
bias, including those that are subconscious and hidden, allows one not only to
become a better clinician, but a better person.” These reflections suggest that
transformative learning here was affective as well as cognitive. Students
described discomfort, empowerment, and self-recognition as turning points in
their understanding, which aligns with Clark and Dirkx’s (2008) claim that
emotion is integral to meaning-making.
Dewey
(1934) described art as a form of experience in which perception and reflection
are unified. While this study did not analyse the comics themselves as visual
data, the written reflections exhibited a related aesthetic quality. Through descriptive and metaphorical language, students translated
emotional experience into reflective understanding. Their writing did not
simply report learning; it became one way of processing it.
Embodiment
entered the reflections less as explicit bodily theory than as professional and
relational awareness. Students repeatedly connected empathy for marginalized
groups to changes in how they imagined speaking, listening, and positioning
themselves in practice. In that sense, written reflection became a space where
cognitive, affective, and ethical dimensions of learning came together.
A second
major insight arises from the ways students used reflective writing to
challenge normative assumptions about identity, authority, and knowledge. The
reflections demonstrate how learners enacted the principles of queer pedagogy
by questioning the supposed neutrality of professional discourse and
acknowledging the partiality of their own perspectives. One participant’s
reflection captured this shift: “Going into a client meeting with the
assumption you already know how a client may relate to their body does not
leave room for an individual to express what their actual lived experience is.”
This statement reflects a movement away from professional certainty toward
relational openness, consistent with queer pedagogy’s aim to trouble
hierarchies of knowledge and authority (Bonnet et al., 2023; Britzman, 1995).
Queer
pedagogy calls for education that resists closure and embraces ambiguity.
Students’ reflections showed this openness as they grappled with contradictions
in their learning. They questioned what it means to be “professional,” how
empathy and objectivity coexist, and how language itself can reinforce or
challenge power. Reflection served as a site of queering because students used
it to unsettle fixed understandings of their roles and assumptions.
One
participant reflected on this process by writing, “It was uncomfortable to
realize I have absorbed some of these stereotypes, but the project gave me a
way to confront them without shame.” The statement reveals that unlearning was
not only intellectual but also affective and ethical. By articulating
discomfort in writing, the learner performed the kind of productive uncertainty
that queer pedagogy values (Kumashiro, 2002). Written
reflection thus became a site for enacting queer pedagogy, transforming exposure
to art into introspective and ethical learning.
At the
same time, the data are stronger on assumption-checking and professional
re-positioning than on identity negotiation in a full sense. Students often
revised how they understood themselves as future practitioners, and sometimes
as learners implicated in normative frameworks, but the reflections more rarely
documented sustained identity reconstruction. Framed this way, the findings
remain substantial while staying closer to what the dataset can support.
The
analysis of figurative language revealed that metaphor operated as a central
mechanism of affective and ethical expression. Through metaphor, students
materialized transformation, giving emotional and intellectual processes
tangible form. These linguistic constructions paralleled the aesthetic modes of
knowing central to arts-based pedagogy.
Participants
frequently used natural and spatial imagery to convey transformation. One
student described “the blooming of the garden” as representing “gradual
self-acceptance considering societal pressures toward normalization,” while
another discussed the wish to “shrink [oneself] to normalcy.” Such metaphors of
growth and contraction rendered visible the movement from constraint toward
openness that characterizes transformative learning. The recurrence of images
such as blooming, shrinking, opening, and journeying suggests that students
conceptualized their learning as embodied motion rather than abstract
cognition. These metaphors also carried ethical force, allowing students to
frame transformation as relational movement rather than as a purely private
insight.
This
finding extends transformative learning theory in a useful way. It suggests
that metaphor can serve as a bridge between feeling and interpretation,
especially when learners are trying to articulate change that is still
emerging. It also supports queer pedagogy’s resistance to closure, since
metaphor allows movement, multiplicity, and partiality rather than forcing
reflection into a single stable declaration.
Findings
in this study deepen understanding of how reflective writing mediates care,
discomfort, and ethical responsibility. Participants consistently described
emotional and moral tension as vital to their learning process. For many,
empathy evolved into awareness of structural power and privilege. One
reflection stated, “This activity helped to provide a framework for structural
competency, showing how body image issues in queer men stem from societal
pressures.” Another participant wrote, “It made me realize that being kind is
not enough; you have to understand the structures that make people feel
unseen.” Such reflections illustrate hooks’ (1994) vision of teaching with love
as a practice of justice rather than sentimentality. Students articulated care
as an active stance grounded in critical awareness rather than as an expression
of comfort.
Through
writing, learners were able to process discomfort safely and analytically. The
act of composing allowed students to pause, reframe, and make sense of their
feelings without withdrawing from them. This written mode of reflection aligns
with Clover and Stalker’s (2007) view that critical reflection can merge
emotional engagement and social analysis. Students used language to narrate
their ethical development, identifying moments when compassion evolved into a
call for advocacy or professional change.
Rather
than avoiding discomfort, students interpreted it as evidence of growth. One
participant captured this in the statement, “It is not about feeling guilty; it
is about staying aware and making changes every day.” This reframes discomfort
as generative rather than negative, positioning emotion as a foundation for
sustained ethical practice.
Students’
reflections also revealed growing recognition of how structural forces shape
individual and professional experience. They moved from describing personal
reactions to analysing institutional systems that perpetuate inequality. One
participant wrote, “Body image is not only about personal confidence but about
social norms that privilege certain kinds of bodies.” Another observed, “Health
care often assumes a straight, able, thin body, and that assumption leaves
people out.”
These
insights represent a later phase of transformative learning, where awareness
becomes socially and professionally oriented (Kasworm & Bowles, 2024).
Students’ reflections demonstrate that they came to view professional identity
within larger structures of power and representation. Reflection thus became a
medium for linking the personal and the political.
This has
direct implications for educators and institutions. For instructors, the
findings suggest that structured reflective writing can foster not only empathy
but also systemic awareness when prompts move students beyond reaction and
toward interpretation, critique, and application. For institutions, the study
suggests that pedagogical designs of this kind deserve to be valued as
intellectually serious work rather than as merely supplemental or affective
add-ons. If higher education is committed to equity, then assessment frameworks
must make room for learning that joins ethical reasoning, self-examination, and
structural analysis.
The
study also underscores that transformation occurs when learners connect
introspection to action. Several participants articulated intentions to adapt
their professional practices to better serve marginalized populations.
Reflection, therefore, did not end with awareness but extended toward
responsibility.
Overall,
these findings suggest that written reflection can function as a powerful mode
of transformative learning. Emotion acted as a catalyst, reflection served as
the medium, and structural awareness emerged as a key outcome. More
precisely, the study suggests that writing about art, rather than producing it,
can still create a meaningful space for rethinking self, power, and
professional responsibility.
This
study was conducted within a single institutional and disciplinary context,
which constrains the generalisability of the findings. The participants were
all students in a professional dietetics program, and their engagement with
queer and arts-based pedagogy occurred within a specific curricular moment.
Consequently, the results should be understood as contextually situated rather
than broadly representative.
As with
all qualitative and arts-informed research, interpretation is shaped by the
researcher’s positionality and analytic lens. While reflexive strategies were
employed to strengthen trustworthiness, the interpretive process remains
partial. The data were derived from written reflections rather than observed
interaction, interviews, or dialogic follow-up; as a result, some dimensions of
embodied, interpersonal, or performative response may not have been fully
captured. The study is therefore strongest in what it can say
about reflective articulation, ethical orientation, and emerging professional
self-positioning, and more limited in what it can claim about durable
transformation beyond the writing itself.
Additionally,
the study did not include longitudinal follow-up, which limits insight into
whether the shifts described in the reflections persisted over time or
translated into sustained changes in practice. Several students
articulated intentions to act differently in future professional contexts, but
those intentions remain aspirational within the bounds of this dataset.
Finally,
while the metaphorical analysis illuminated the aesthetic and emotional
dimensions of reflection, its inclusion emerged post hoc. This
became analytically generative, but it also means that metaphor was not built
into the original study design as an explicit analytic focus. That
constraint may have limited the depth of theoretical triangulation across data
sources.
Future
research should explore how arts-based and queer pedagogical concepts operate
across disciplinary and institutional contexts. Comparative studies involving
other professional programs, such as education, social work, or nursing, could
clarify how disciplinary discourse shapes the affective and ethical outcomes of
reflective practice.
Longitudinal
designs would be especially useful in tracing how students’ insights evolve as
they move into professional practice. Such work could help determine whether
the affective, ethical, and metaphorical shifts identified here lead to
sustained behavioural change or remain primarily reflective achievements within
the classroom.
Further methodological development is also
warranted. Combining written reflections with creative artefacts, visual
journals, interviews, or group dialogue could deepen understanding of how
aesthetic and linguistic modes of expression interact. Because the present study suggests that
students often worked through uncertainty in partial, figurative, and
self-corrective ways, future research might also examine more closely how
metaphor functions during discussion, revision, and collaborative meaning-making,
rather than only in final written texts.
Finally,
research that more explicitly attends to intersectionality, including race,
gender, class, migration, and linguistic location, could further illuminate how
arts-based reflection mediates complex forms of ethical and professional
positioning. That question is especially important here because
some of the student reflections suggest that prior cultural context shaped how
participants encountered queer content, but the present dataset does not
support a fuller analysis of those differences.
This
study examined how arts-based and queer pedagogical practices can support
transformative learning in professional education through structured reflective
writing. The analysis showed that students’ learning was mediated not only
through emotional and ethical reflection, but also through the metaphorical and
aesthetic language that gave those experiences form. Reflection functioned as
both a cognitive and creative process, enabling learners to translate affective
response into insight and ethical awareness.
The
findings suggest that transformative learning in this context involved an
interplay of emotion, relational awareness, and critical examination of bias.
Students’ reflections showed that self-awareness and professional
responsibility often emerged through discomfort, empathy, and growing attention
to structural inequity. Metaphorical expression played a central role in this
process, functioning as an aesthetic bridge between feeling and interpretation.
Through figurative language, learners gave tangible form to processes of
unlearning and ethical reorientation that align closely with arts-based and
queer pedagogies.
The
study contributes to scholarship on transformative learning by showing that
written reflection can serve as an arts-informed mode of inquiry.
Transformation here was not confined to visual or performative expression. It
also occurred through language that enacted movement, growth, and relational
connection. More precisely, the study suggests that writing
about art can itself become part of the transformative event, not merely a
record of it.
Pedagogically,
the study affirms the value of integrating aesthetic and affective dimensions
into professional education. Structured reflection anchored in creative
material can support not only awareness of diversity and equity, but also the
interior work required for more ethically responsive practice. If
professional education is serious about preparing students for relational and
justice-oriented work, then pedagogies that make room for uncertainty, feeling,
and critical self-examination should not be treated as peripheral. They are
part of the work.
Overall,
the study extends the understanding of arts-based pedagogy as a practice of
relational ethics and critical imagination. It suggests that language itself
can be a site of transformation, where learners begin to rework professional
identity through the intertwining of emotion, art, and reflection.
Ahmed, S. (2020). Complaint! Duke
University Press.
Anttila, E., Tuovinen, T., & Jaakonaho, L. (2024). Reflective documentation in arts
education: Expanding ways of thinking through multimodal, embodied practices. Research
in Arts and Education, 2024(3), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.54916/rae.136528
Aragón, M. J., Corella, M., & Lang, N. W.
(2025). “They’re like slash”: Multimodality and embodied agency in students’
critical engagements with texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(1),
e585. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.585
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts-based
research. SAGE.
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions
and education. Routledge.
Boncori, I.,
Brewis, D. N., Mandalaki, E., & van Amsterdam, N.
(2024). Embodied writing. Culture and Organization, 30(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2024.2317049
Bonnet, J. L., Herakova,
L., & Karim, T. (2023). Queering/querying educational spaces: The LGBTQIA2+
learning and affirming challenge. Feminist Pedagogy, 3(4), 10. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/feministpedagogy/vol3/iss4/10
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman.
Polity.
Brady, J., & Ng, E.
(2025). From equity, diversity, and inclusion to justice: Calling in for
collective learning and action on racism in dietetics. Canadian Journal of
Dietetic Practice and Research, 86(1), 16-23.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2),
77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Britzman, D. (1995). Is there a queer pedagogy?
Or, stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45(2),
151-165. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x
Brookfield, S. D. (2024). Critical theory and
transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The
handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp.
131-146). Wiley.
Caniglia, G., & Vogel, C. (2023). On being
oriented: Strengthening transgressive orientations in transdisciplinary
sustainability research through queer theory. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives
for Science and Society, 32(1), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.1.15
Chappell, S. V., & Chappell, D. (2016).
Building social inclusion through critical arts-based pedagogies in university
classroom communities. International Journal of Inclusive Education,
20(3), 292-308.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1047658
Clark, M. C., & Dirkx, J. M. (2008). The
emotional self in adult learning. New Directions for Adult & Continuing
Education, 2008(120), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.319
Clover, D. E., & Stalker, J. (2007). The
arts and social justice: Re-crafting adult education and community cultural
leadership. NIACE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social
research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
de Carvalho, T. (2025). Beyond theory:
Arts-based practices and cultural ethos for transformative eco-social learning.
International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2025.v14.x.007
Denton, J. M., & Cain, L. K. (2023).
Creating queer epistemologies and embodied knowledge through narrative and
arts-based research. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 12(4), 133-157.
https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2023.12.4.133
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience.
Perigee.
Dirkx, J. M. (2001). The power of feelings:
Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. New
Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 63-72. http://doi.org/10.1002/ace.9
Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning:
Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge.
Fraser, J., & Lamble, S. (2014). Queer
desires and critical pedagogies in higher education: Reflections on the
transformative potential of non-normative learning desires in the classroom. Journal
of Feminist Scholarship, 7(7), 61-77. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol7/iss7/7
Gheller, B. J., Joy,
P., & Lordly, D. (2018). A qualitative study exploring the experience of
the male dietitian from student to professional. Canadian Journal of
Dietetic Practice and Research, 79(2), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2020.1806891
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress:
Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Jonker, F. (2024). Towards
response-able arts-based practices in higher education [Doctoral
dissertation, Utrecht University]. https://doi.org/10.33540/2504
Joy, P. (2025). No T, no shade, no pink
lemonade: An auto-theoretical analysis of student feedback to queer content in
dietetics education. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 86(4).
https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2025-024
Joy, P., Gauvin, S. E. M., Aston, M., & Numer, M. (2020). Reflections in comic: The views of queer
artists in producing body image comics and how their work can improve health. Journal
of Graphic Novels and Comics, 12(5), 885-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2020.1806891
Joy, P., Gauvin, S., & Lee, M. (2019). Rainbow
reflections: Body image comics for queer men. Ad Astra Comix.
Kasworm, C. E., & Bowles, T. A. (2024).
Fostering transformative learning in higher education settings. In E. W. Taylor
& P. Cranton (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory,
research, and practice (pp. 388-403). Wiley.
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2024).
Critically
engaging participatory action research. Routledge.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning:
Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kreber, C. (2012). Critical reflection and
transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The
handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp.
323-341). Wiley.
Kumashiro, K.
(2002). Troubling education: Queer activism and anti-oppressive pedagogy.
Routledge.
Leavy, P. (2020). Method meets art:
Arts-based research practice (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Marnell, J. (2017). Radical imaginings:
Queering the politics and praxis of participatory arts-based research. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Critically
engaging participatory action research. Routledge.
McDonald, Z., & Motala, S. (2022). Beyond
heteronormativity towards social justice: Disrupting gender operationalisation
in teaching and learning trends in higher education. Critical Studies in
Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 23-38. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/cristal/article/view/240691
McLean, H. (2022). Creative arts-based
geographies: Some cautionary and hopeful reflections. ACME: An
International Journal for Critical Geographies, 21(3), 311-326.
McMain, E. (2024). Embracing the sociality and
emotionality of learning through a critical pedagogy of discomfort and
compassion. In D. C. Sawyer, J. T. Torres, & S. S. Hudd (Eds.), How to
incorporate equity and justice in your teaching (pp. 61-82). Edward Elgar
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035318209.00012
Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective transformation.
Adult Education, 28(2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171367802800202
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an
adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates
(Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in
progress (pp. 3-33). Jossey-Bass.
Norton, D., Norton, F. A., & Veciana, S. (2024). Connected art practice: Transformative
learning environments for transdisciplinary competences. Societies, 14(3),
33. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14030033
Rice, C. (2015). Rethinking fat: From bio-to
body-becoming pedagogies. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 15(5),
387-397.
Rolling, J. H. (2013). Arts-based research
primer. Peter Lang.
Sameshima, P., Maarhuis,
P., & Wiebe, S. (2019). Parallaxic
praxis: Multimodal interdisciplinary pedagogical research design. Vernon
Press.
Selvaraj, K. (2021). Being queer and brown: A
queer, decolonial, arts-based, autoethnographic enquiry into art therapy
pedagogical institutions and spaces. JoCAT, 16(1).
Scott, D., & Fawaz, R. (2018).
Introduction: Queer about comics. American Literature, 90(2),
197-219.
Sinervo, K. A.,
& Freedman, A. (2022). Feeling your pain: Empathy in comics. Journal of
Graphic Novels and Comics, 13(4), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2021.1951786
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Kind, S. W.
(2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative
Inquiry, 11(6), 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280
Taylor, E. W. (2009). Fostering transformative
learning. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning
in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp.
3-17). Jossey-Bass.
Wargo, J. M. (2019). Lights! Cameras! Genders?
Interrupting hate through classroom tinkering, digital media production and
culturally sustaining arts-based inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 58(1), 18-28.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1536919
Woolley, S. W. (2022). A queercripistemological
vulnerable pedagogy of care. Sex Education, 23(2), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2087058